Showing posts with label Stocks to Sell. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stocks to Sell. Show all posts

Best Energy Stocks Pick For 2013

President Obama made a speech where he announced a goal of cutting oil imports by a third over the next decade. He included a pledge to have federal agencies buy only alt-fuel vehicles by 2015 and a promise to expand U.S. oil exploration and production.
Transitioning half the cars and trucks in the U.S. to natural gas transportation over the next 5 to 10 years could reduce foreign oil imports by 5 million barrels every day.
So natural gas is an obvious play. Renewable/alternative fuels are other good choices.
Here are my four best picks that could make investors a bundle from  the President’s new policy:
Best Energy Stocks Pick For 2013#1—
Clean Energy Fuels (CLNE)
The company owns and/or supplies more than 200 natural gas fueling stations across the U.S. and Canada. It serves over 320 fleet customers operating over 20,000 natural gas vehicles. The customers can use Clean Energy’s fuel stations to tank up their vehicles with compressed natural gas (CNG) or liquefied natural gas (LNG).
Clean Energy Fuels also provides natural gas vehicle systems and conversions for taxis, limousines, vans, pick-up trucks, and shuttle buses through its BAF subsidiary in Texas. Clean Energy helps customers buy and finance natural gas vehicles and obtain government incentives.
The company buys CNG from local utilities and produces LNG at its two plants (in California and Texas) with a combined capacity of 260,000 gallons per day.
Clean Energy owns and operates an LNG liquefaction plant near Houston, Texas, which it calls the Pickens Plant, capable of producing up to 35 million gallons of LNG per year.
And investors who buy CLNE won’t be alone …
Founder and billionaire oilman T. Boone Pickens owns a sizeable chunk of Clean Energy.
Best Energy Stocks Pick For 2013 #2—
Westport Innovations (WPRT)
This company makes natural gas engines for forklifts, oilfield services engines, trucks and buses and automobiles. Its 50-50 joint venture Cummins Westport project builds natural gas vehicle engines for trucks and buses that could refill at the clean energy stations built by Clean Energy.
It made revenues of $154 million in the last year and isn’t close to profitability yet. But a concerted push toward natural-gas powered vehicles could change that.
WPRT is at the top of its 52-week range. So I’d wait for a pullback.
Best Energy Stocks Pick For 2013 #3—
Talisman Energy (TLM)
Talisman had 1.4 billion barrels of oil equivalent in reserves last year. It has material positions in three world-class, liquids-heavy shale plays in North America: The Marcellus shale (Pennsylvania), Montney shale (British Columbia) and Utica shale (Quebec). It is also expanding its Eagle Ford shale properties, in a 50-50 joint venture with Statoil.
The company also signed two $1.05 billion deals with Sasol of South Africa. This partnership is sketching out plans for a new multibillion-dollar facility near Edmonton that could process as much as a billion cubic feet of natural gas a day into 96,000 barrels of refined products through the Fischer-Tropsch process.
Fischer-Tropsch works by using heat and chemical catalysts to break down a substance like natural gas into its molecular basics and then rebuild those molecules into something else — such as diesel.
Why do that?
A barrel of oil contains roughly six times the energy content of a thousand cubic feet of gas. Since 6 thousand cubic feet of gas is worth about $24 (U.S.), and one barrel of oil is worth about $100, there is a tremendous profit margin if you can convert one to the other cost-effectively.
Best Energy Stocks Pick For 2013 #4—
PowerShares Wilderhill
Clean Energy Fund (PBW)
This is one of the largest alternative energy ETFs with over $500 million in assets. Large holdings include GT Solar, Yingli Green Energy, SunPower Corp., Trina Solar and more.

Top 10 High Dividend Growth Stocks for Long-Term Returns

Dividend growth stocks are one of the best-kept secrets in the investing world. After all, these are high-quality companies with strong competitive advantages that allow them to generate rising earnings over time. As a result, most of these companies generate so much in excess cash flow that they are able to pay a higher dividend over time without sacrificing long-term growth.
Companies that raise dividends at a high rate could easily generate double-digit yields on cost for investors who bought early and at the right time.
The following dividend champions have the highest consistent dividend growth rates:
Lowe’s (NYSE:LOW), together with its subsidiaries, operates as a home improvement retailer in the United States and Canada. The company has boosted distributions for 49 years in a row. Ten-year annual dividend growth rate: 27.6%. Yield: 2.8%. (analysis)
McDonald’s (NYSE:MCD), together with its subsidiaries, operates as a worldwide foodservice retailer. The company has increased distributions for 35 consecutive years. Ten-year annual dividend growth rate: 26.5% Yield: 2.8%. (analysis)
Raven Industries (NASDAQ:RAVN) manufactures various products for industrial, agricultural, construction and military/aerospace markets in the United States and internationally. The company has boosted distributions for 25 years in a row. Ten-year annual dividend growth rate: 18.2%. Yield: 1.5%.
Wal-Mart (NYSE:WMT) operates retail stores in various formats worldwide. The company has increased distributions for 37 consecutive years. Ten-year annual dividend growth rate: 17.8% Yield: 2.8%. (analysis)

Best Investment For 2012 - 3 Shocking Energy Trends That Should Scare Investors

Energy is the lifeblood of the global economy. Factories need energy to run, and goods need fuel to get shipped.

So it is wise for investors to keep an eye on trends in the energy sector as a way to gauge the status of the economic recovery — or, when trends are ugly, a sign that investors might be in for a bumpy ride.

There are a host of indicators and headlines relating to oil and energy consumption, but here are three recent reports I found that I think are particularly telling.

All three should set off warning bells, and investors should take note:
Diesel Consumption

The UCLA Anderson School of Management teams up with employment services firm Ceridian Corporation to track real-time diesel fuel consumption data. The pair’s most recent report shows an alarming decline in use of the key fuel.

Specifically, the “Pulse of Commerce Index” — that’s the official name for the diesel data — fell 1.7% in January following a 0.4% decrease in December. January’s figures are not just down month-over-month, but also off 2.2% from last year.


Click to Enlarge Most disturbing? The diesel index shows almost zero growth since the summer of 2010. Check out the chart.

“It seems difficult to square the behavior of the PCI with the evident improvement in a number of economic indicators, most notably the increase in payroll jobs and the decrease in initial claims for unemployment,” said Ed Leamer, chief economist for the index.

In short, something doesn’t add up.

This index is not a magic measuring stick. But diesel obviously is a crucial part of the national economy and a good proxy for rail traffic and truck traffic … and thus worth paying attention to.
Gasoline Deliveries


Click to Enlarge As with diesel, broader gasoline deliveries reflect the ebb and flow of the economy. Check out this chart about monthly total U.S. deliveries as measured by the U.S. Energy Information Administration:

This data is most interesting because it is raw. It is not “seasonally adjusted” or modified based on flash estimates and revisions. It is, for all intents and purposes, real demand.

The biggest takeaway? Retail gasoline deliveries are well below 1980 levels, with no sign of rebound, despite the fact that the recession is “over.”

Now, we have to consider that these are deliveries, not raw demand. So the phenomenon takes into account the general trend that gas stations are stockpiling much less than they used to — likely because margins are so tight and there isn’t a lot of cash on hand to tie up in inventories. Stations are not in the storage business at all these days.

But it’s hard to blame everything on a drop in inventories alone. In November 1983, gasoline deliveries were 51.1 thousand gallons per day. In November 2010, the total was 42.8 thousand gallons daily. Even more disturbing? Just a year later, in November 2011, they were 30.9 thousand gallons.
No Leaders in Alternative Energy
Click here to find out more!

Energy isn’t all about fossil fuels, cars and broad demand. So-called “green collar” jobs are part of what should be an emerging industry as alternative energy gains popularity and as Americans move toward cleaner sources of power.

Except there’s no money in green energy. So companies are going under and jobs are being eliminated, not added.

Take First Solar (NASDAQ:FSLR), the biggest U.S. solar company, which ousted its chief executive officer in October and still is seeking a replacement. Few people want the job, since FSLR stock has gone from over $310 per share in 2008 to a mere $40 right now. Earnings per share have fallen from $7.68 in 2010 to $5.80 in 2011 to a projected $3.93 in 2012. Not good for the heavyweight of U.S. solar.

Wind isn’t much better. At Vestas Wind Systems (PINK:VWDRY), the largest turbine maker, the chairman and finance director are leaving after the company cut sales forecasts twice in three months.

If there is trouble filling jobs in the corner office, that’s not very inspiring for rank-and-file employees.

Throw in the bankruptcy of Solyndra LLC, which left the U.S. government responsible for $527 million in debt, and things are ugly in alternative energy.

Just consider this telling quote from an alternative energy headhunter, trying to find leaders for these struggling companies:

“It’s becoming significantly more difficult to attract people into this market,” said a clean technology recruiter at Korn/Ferry International. “In my 15 years, this is probably the most difficult time to recruit.”

Jeff Reeves is the editor of InvestorPlace.com. Write him at editor@investorplace.com, follow him on Twitter via @JeffReevesIP and become a fan of InvestorPlace on Facebook. As of this writing, he did not own a position in any of the aforementioned stocks.

3 Stocks That Are Better Than Facebook to buy in 2012

Chances are that you have to allocate your investing dollars wisely and where you think you’ll get the best payoff. So, should you put your money on Facebook? Or might it be another company?
I actually think investors can find some much better deals to choose from — without worrying about the fickleness of Internet fads, upstart competitors — which are getting tons of venture capital — as well as giant rivals like Google (NASDAQ:GOOG). Besides, in the Facebook S-1, Mark Zuckerberg does write: “we don’t build services to make money; we make money to build better services.” Yes, this may be scary for some investors.
So what might be some other stocks to consider? Here’s my shortlist of those with a market cap similar to Facebook’s estimated $100 billion:
3 Stocks That Are Better Than Facebook to buy in 2012 - ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) — $92 billion market cap.
Let’s face it, the world is having a tougher time finding oil reserves. Yet the demand continues to grow, especially in countries like China.
In the latest quarter, Conoco’s profits came to $3.39 billion while revenues increased by 17% to $62.39 billion. The company also plans to spin off its refining division, which will generate cash to pay down debt and allow for more focus on deepwater exploration.
Finally, Conoco has a juicy dividend, currently at 3.8%.  In other words, if you bought Conoco for $92 billion, your annual distribution would be $3.5 billion.  That should be enough for any kind of lifestyle.
Oh yeah, Berkshire Hathaway’s (NYSE:BRK.A) Warren Buffett, who is probably still worth more than Facebook’s Zuckerberg, holds 2.19% of the stock.
3 Stocks That Are Better Than Facebook to buy in 2012 - McDonald’s (NYSE:MCD) — $100 billion market cap.
As seen recently, the company has had some snafus with its social media marketing campaigns. But it’s something that Mickey D. will definitely learn from. When it comes to building a brand, few are better than McDonald’s.
And as InvestorPlace.com contributor Gene Marcial points out, the company is really the Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) of fast food. And unlike Facebook, it also has a thriving business in China.
Despite the sluggishness in the global economy — especially in Europe — McDonald’s still finds ways to crank out growth. In November, global comparable sales growth came to 7.4%.
What about a dividend? The current yield is 2.8%.
3 Stocks That Are Better Than Facebook to buy in 2012 - QUALCOMM (NASDAQ:QCOM) — $103 billion market cap.
Yesterday, Qualcomm reported a blowout quarter. Revenues soared by 40% to $4.68 billion, with profits coming to $1.4 billion, or 81 cents per share. The company sees next quarter’s revenues at $4.6 billion to $5 billion, which compares to the analyst consensus of $4.51 billion.
Of course, Qualcomm is getting a lift from its Apple business, and it has lots of strength in India and China. So, in light of the expected momentum in the smartphone market, Qualcomm is likely to continue to post high-performance results. By contrast, Facebook makes virtually nothing from its mobile business.
Something else: Qualcomm even has a decent dividend yield of 1.5%.  Don’t expect a dividend from Facebook anytime soon.

Best Stocks to buy 2012 Labels