The Global Debt Bubble Damns 2012

The curse of too much debt is playing havoc? with the presidential political campaign, with the threat of sovereign defaults in Europe, and with the strained financial condition of banks in Europe, the US, China, and causing a steep decline in takeover and merger activity here is the U.S.
Nations, banks and corporations are late in tackling? this problem for the reason it means deleveraging, less takeover activity, the need to pay off debt with more newer debt– and the absolute mandatory austerity, ie less growth, lower stock prices, higher unemployment all? this implies.
Example; JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon said publicly that JPM has $15 billion in lines of credit to Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece and Spain, and could under bad circumstances, lose $5 billion of that, a sum that seemed not to shake Dimon.
Example: It has been reported that BankAmerica would like to shift tens of trillions in derivative contracts from the books of its subsidiary, Merrill Lynch & Co, to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp, so as to avoid the threat to its balance sheet from the possibility not being able to collect on these contracts. No one is confirming this need to pass off huge derivative liabilities? to the federal government.
Debt stands at the summit of the debate over what kind of capitalistic system we want. Because money cost near to nothing, deals were being done in 2006 that were bound to create huge nonperforming loans, losses for pension funds, a black eye for Wall Street– and a huge issue of the coming campaign about the money-making tactics of Republican candidate Mitt Romney.
This should trigger a rigorous debate about Wall Street’s role in the US economy– and its monied influence on the lawmakers in Washington.
Hardly anyone noticed a frank blunt speech by Carlyle founder David Rubenstein in Debai on October 15, 2008– at the very apex of the meltdown that threatened stability of gthe financial system. I wrote abo! ut it th en– and want to repeat its findings as a warning signal just as Carlyle is going to issue its shares publicly.
Credit the brainy Rubenstein for outing the rates of leverage in the financial system. Take Private Equity– the Mitt Romney issue– where most firms were dangerously borrowing $6.20 for every $1.00 in equity capital they had invested in a deal. That’s a? ratio of debt to equity of 6 to 1– meaning that if any deal lost more than 17% in value it was in effect insolvent and unless it sold assets could not pay its debt, or for that matter raise more.
Hedge funds in the fall of 2008, were borrowing on average about $ $4.00 in debt for every $1.00 in equity. The European banks like Deutsche Bank, UBS and Barclays were leveraged up 7 to 10 times more than the Private Equity Crowd– and the American investment banks were basically insolvent with debt to equity in some cases 6-7 times more than Carlyle and Blackstone. While Private Equity might have single transactions file for bankruptcy, entire banks like Lehman had to file for bankruptcy– and Merrill Lynch, Wachovia would have done so without shotgun marriages– and Citigroup and BankAmeriuca would have followed suit without federal bailouts.
Today, the stigma is in Europe. The Greek Prime Minister warned yesterday that $1 trillion? Euros must be refinanced in Europe by the end of March– and that hedge funds owned some 25% of Greece’s debt. Expect the fallout from too much debt everywhere to colr market action and part of gthe public debate about t he future of Capitalism.

Looking for a Fixer-Upper? Try Home Center Stocks

This is not the best of times to be in retail in general, or home-related retail in particular, but it may be the moment for investors to look at hardware store stocks.
Let's look at the hardware big boxes, where there is plenty of room for improvement in the market. Just in mid-November, Home Depot CEO Frank Blake was telling analysts: "Inventories remain high, pricing is under pressure and credit is still difficult."
That pretty much sums it all up for hardware stores. All the plastic, copper, and lumber you need for pipes, wiring, and two-by-fours is having commodity price pressures. And that means margin pressure. At the same time, the hardware chains are having to invest in improving store facilities after taking costs out to balance their books earlier in the recession.
Neither Home Depot (NYSE: HD  ) nor Lowe's (NYSE: LOW  ) is baking a housing recovery into its 2012 estimates, so if housing were to surprise even slightly on the upside, the effect on their stocks could be noticeable.
Housing: still in the doghouse
The biggest snag for home center chains has been simply that the housing slump has lasted longer than expected, leaving them no room for error. At first, they cut costs and moved focus from selling to construction pros to pushing moderately priced stuff such as paint and flooring to DIY homeowners fixing the homes they couldn't sell.
But by the end of 2011, they had made real structural changes, closing stores and investing in technology to make store operations more efficient. That meant higher capital expense at a time when inventory costs were also under pressure.
In Lowe's case, it added a fair amount of expenses as part of its latest restructuring, which included overhauling inventory and closing stores. The latest move was buying online retailer ATG at the end of the year. Like many retailers, Lowe's needed a ha! ndle on e-commerce and decided to buy instead of build.
However, there is good news as well. COO Robert Hull indicated Lowe's is expected to crank out about $2.1 billion in free cash flow during the next fiscal year. Lowe's managers also said they've laid out a five-year plan to get them to 2015 with no expectation of a "frothy housing market."
Lowe's is where Home Depot was a couple of years ago, trying to fix stores and boost sales, and its stock has been driven down by those issues, which gives it a bit more upside potential. Fool Austin Smith likes Lowe's over Home Depot as a better shareholder value for buying back far more of its shares.
And Home Depot has burned through quite a bit of upside potential already. It was one of the best performers in the Dow in 2011, as The Fool pointed out recently. It hit its 52-week high recently, and as fellow Fool Dan Caplinger mentioned, it's expensive and investing in it requires faith in the housing recovery, so the short-term upside is slim.
But Home Depot has been paying dividends regularly and accelerated its share repurchase plan last year. If you're a value investor, there are worse places to be in retail than a sector leader who pays regular dividends.
It's up to you whether you want to back the favorite or the scrappy upstart. But keep in mind, the U.S. is not Japan -- retail is not facing a lost decade. Housing and consumer spending will pick up, because Americans are shoppers and homeowners by nature. Saturday morning at the hardware store is not a ritual in danger of extinction.
So if you are hoping for a real retail recovery, invest in Home Depot, Lowe's, or even Orchard Supply Hardware -- these days, it beats putting your money on stocks of clothing chains or bookstores -- but keep a long horizon.
If you're interested in the Dow's top stocks on your quest for great dividend-paying stocks, The Motley Fool has compiled a special free report outlining our 11 favorite dependable dividend-paying stocks.! It's ca lled "Secure Your Future With 11 Rock-Solid Dividend Stocks." You can access your free copy today! Just click here to discover the winners we've picked.

Best Stocks to buy 2012 Labels