Banking is back in Latin America

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) � Banking is back in Latin America. While most of the rest of the world is still recovering from the global financial crisis of 2008, Latin American banks have recovered.
Five factors have fueled that growth: a growing middle class, access to banks for the previously �unbanked� population, growth in deposits, a broader and expanding loan portfolio, and greater efficiency by Latin American banks.
Brazilian banks have led the surge, occupying the top five spots on The Banker�s list of the best Latin American banks. They�ve done this mainly by focusing on the growth of the middle class. The middle class in Latin America has grown to 51% of the population in the major economies in 2011, from just 41% in 2001. That growth in the middle class has pushed per capita income to $11,900 from $7,600 a decade ago.
It has also increased the demand for consumer loans: be they mortgages, car loans, or small business or industry loans.
Itau Unibanco Holdings SA ITUB , has focused on reducing costs and streamlining efficiency since the two banks merged in November 2008 to form Brazil�s largest bank. �But I can guarantee that we will not reduce our investment plans as part of that effort,� CEO Roberto Setubal said. Itau Unibanco has been rapidly expanding both within Brazil and across Latin America, capitalizing on success in consumer banking.

Regional growth

Itau Unibanco is just one of several banks with eyes on the rest of Latin America. �The flow of investments among the region�s various countries is increasing strongly,� said Andre Esteves, BancoBTG Pactual�s chief executive, in a statement. �Capita! l market s are developing at a fast pace in Colombia and Peru. Even the more mature markets, such as Brazil and Chile, continue to have high growth rates. We are very optimistic about the perspectives for Latin America.�
With money from Abu Dhabi, Singapore and China, BTG Pactual has grown to become one of Brazil�s top-10 banks. It recently expanded into Chile, Colombia and Peru and has reportedly been meeting with investment banks to launch its own shares over the next few months.
Recent analyst reports have suggested the major banks in Latin America, such as Itau Unibanco and BancoBradesco BBD , are losing market share to smaller, regional banks. We don�t see this as a reason not to invest in the larger banks. While they may end up losing share nationally, we believe the bigger banks will gain from their cross-border initiatives and from the rapid overall growth of banking in Latin America. Even if they did lose market share, that doesn�t mean their growth will slow. Like elsewhere, being bigger is a plus in Latin America�s banking industry.
There has been some backlash in Latin America as a result of the global financial crisis. Latin American countries have been more apt to approve regulations to protect consumers against fraud since 2008, and these same rules have not just protected consumers, but also shielded the local banking industry from foreign predators.
Even without better regulations, we expect you will start to see more intra-Latin America mergers and fewer acquisitions from developed countries. Already Latin American banks have pushed foreign banks from the top positions, in businesses including retail banking and investment banking. Last year, Itau Unibanco pushed Citigroup C �and Credit Suisse Group CS �CH:CSGN �from their top positions in investment banking.
But retail banking remains the key that most banks are after. In a survey for the Economist Intelligence Unit, most executives (27%) expect the greatest increase in competition in retail banking, compared with 17% in investment banking, 15% in corporate banking and 12% in consumer finance and cards.
The one country in Latin America where foreign banks have held onto their positions, and in some cases increased, is Mexico. Indeed, Spain�s Banco Santander ES:SAN �has amplified its penetration in Mexico, while also actively playing a large role in banking in Argentina, Uruguay, Chile and, to a lesser extent, in Brazil. Citibank, with its control of Banamex, has also benefited from its Mexico operations by penetrating retail banking and issuing more than a million credit cards per year.

Unbanked

And that brings us back to one of the strongest reasons to invest in Latin American banks: reaching the unbanked population. Half of the population in Latin America still does not use banks. In Brazil, 58% still use cash at supermarkets, with just 15% of purchases coming from credit cards and another 15% from debit cards.
A study by GrupoBursatilMexicano shows the potential of Latin American countries in bank loans to the private sector: If Chile is the model with close to 70% of private sector loans as a percentage of GDP, Brazil is still far behind at 50%, and Colombia (30% of! GDP) an d Mexico (less than 20%) are even further behind.
Latin Americans have devised their own ways to bring the unbanked into the mainstream. Even if it�s using a prepaid card for purchases, or having bank branches or ATMs in supermarkets, the growth of these will only pick up as the emerging middle class expands.
In Brazil, as in many South American countries, ATMs are often not operated by banks but by third parties. These kiosks are often much more prominent than the ATMs of banks. The largest of these is TecBan, which is planning to expand its network of Banco24Horas ATMs to 13,000 by the end of 2012, from 11,000 currently. TecBan plans to install ATMs at gas stations, supermarkets, shopping centers, drug stores, and subway, bus and rail stations. The company generates revenue by charging financial institutions a fixed price per transaction.
In summary, we think the banking sector in Latin America is going to benefit long-term from the growth of the middle class, and from greater access to the unbanked population, especially as new technologies gain adoption such as mobile banking and innovations in credit cards.

Gen Y Takes 'Collaborative' Approach to Finances

TD Ameritrade released a survey Wednesday on the differences in financial education and attitudes between generations.

The report noted that Gen Y is "collaborative" when it comes to finding financial information; 60% will ask their friends, relatives and colleagues for information, compared with 46% of Gen X, 43% of boomers and just 31% of matures. It should be no surprise then that one-third of Gen Y respondents turn to social media for news about the economy and financial markets.

The survey found 61% of respondents use television and radio talk shows for information on economic and financial issues. Over 50% use daily newspapers. People born between 1930 and 1945, or matures, were most likely to use daily newspapers, while those born between 1965 and 1989, which includes Gen X and Gen Y, were most likely to use news websites. Almost two-thirds of Gen Y respondents say they use news websites, and 52% of Gen X respondents do.

Boomers are most likely to use professional advisors to get news, but older generations are similarly dependent on advisors. Thirty-eight percent of boomers, 37% of matures and 32% of Gen X use their advisor to get news about the economy and financial markets, but just 21% of Gen Y does.

There's a gap, however, in where respondents go for information and how much they trust those sources. While 38% of boomers go to their advisor for information, just 22% reported that they trust their advisor. Gen X didn't indicate trust in any one source; rather, 17% noted traditional media, investment advisors and news-oriented websites each as trustworthy sources.

While 21% of Gen Y respondents said they trust their friends or talk show hosts, just 10% say they trust professional advisors as a source of news.

Most respondents (81%) say they were exposed to money management principles before they turned 20, and almost 80% of respondents feel this was appropriate. Younger generations are learning to save and spend wisely at younger ages. Forty-one percent of matures say they learned financial principles in their teens, compared with 69% of Gen Y.

Parents were unsurprisingly the most frequently cited source of financial education, but 74% of respondents said they felt schools should take more responsibility. Compared with Gen X and Gen Y, matures are twice as likely to think that employers should play a role in financial education.

Although most respondents learned the basics early, 57% said they didn't learn about investing in the stock market until their 20s or 30s. Among respondents who own stocks, bonds, mutual funds or exchange-traded funds, 54% say they have "just average knowledge" of the stock market.

Gen Y and matures agreed that managing their income and living within their means was their top financial priority, though Gen Y was slightly more confident about their ability to do so (47% compared with 44% of matures). Boomers just want to live comfortably (34%), but only 26% are confident in their ability to do that. Gen X is focused on reducing personal debt - one-quarter said this was their biggest priority – and are confident they can do so. Gen X is also the most likely to say they regret not saving enough for the future (62%), although all generations agreed this was their biggest regret.

Older generations agreed, though, that being debt-free was their definition of financial success, with roughly one-third of each group citing no debt as a mark of success. Among Gen Y respondents, 36% said being able to put money aside each month was how they defined financial success.

Nearly 60% of matures say they have already achieved financial success. Younger generations are far less likely to agree. Just 18% of boomers say they've achieved success, compared with 8% of Gen X and 9% of Gen Y. While Gen Y is ever so slightly more apt than Gen X to say they've achieved financial success, they're also most likely to say they are on their way to success. Sixty-four percent of Gen Y respondents say they are on their way, compared with 56% of Gen X and 48% of boomers. Sadly, 20% of boomers and Gen X say that while they're working on it, they may never be financially successful. At 13%, Gen X respondents are most likely to say it's unlikely that they'll achieve financial success, followed closely by boomers at 12%.

Matures who are struggling to achieve financial success attribute their difficulties to costs associated with health care, while the younger generations agree their biggest obstacle is expenses that are rising faster than their income.

Eighty-five percent of respondents reported that it requires more self-discipline and knowledge to manage personal finances today than it used to, according to the report. Still, 93% say they are confident about their ability to manage their finances, although 60% said they would be more comfortable if they knew more about investing. Of the 55% of respondents who called themselves "investors," Gen X and Gen Y were more likely to say managing their personal budget was more difficult than managing their investment portfolio. Boomers were evenly split – 47% said their personal budget was more difficult to manage, and 47% said their investment portfolio was more challenging.

The survey was conducted in late 2010 by Maritz Inc. among over 950 adults between 21 and 80.

Best Stocks to buy 2012 Labels